Not worth buying, too many limitations & issues
We had been evauluating multiple products for this kind of tool and below is the genunie feedback of this product.
1. Unable to fetch URLs properly from platforms like Nimbus; raised a concern, but the suggested 3-step fix is too lengthy.
2. Answers are relevant, but related images are either missing or not displayed properly.
3. Highlighted parts in the PDF require clicking on citations to verify, which is not user-friendly.
4. The PDF display is not clear, making it hard to read, after zooming too.
5. The tool runs very slowly.
6. Switching between answers, citations, and PDF sections is not seamless.
7. To chat with multiple documents, need to assign the same label to each doc, which will allow to interact with all docs under that label.
Christophe_docAnalyzer.ai
May 22, 2025Thank you for your detailed feedback—we genuinely appreciate the time you took to share your experience.
2) Image Support – Just to clarify, image extraction and rendering is not a feature we currently advertise or claim to support. It's on our roadmap and under active development, but not yet part of the current product offering.
4) If you could give us the id of the document, we could check that but it's the first time I get this note.
5) Performance – The response speed is largely influenced (over 90%) by the AI model you select. Some providers like DeepSeek or Claude Opus may be slower, while others like Gemini or GPT-4.1 are significantly faster. We're working on improving model selection guidance and default settings to help users find the right balance between speed and quality.