Q: Has anybody checked this from AppSumo?

This is ridiculous. This tool is created straight out of the boilerplate from PicYard without any modifications except branding. The best part? Picyard is giving a lifetime deal at $20 while this is being listed on AS for $49.
Folks at AppSumo - this is your credibility at stake not his

snack9Jun 27, 2025
Founder Team
Sohails

Sohails

Jun 27, 2025

A: Picbolt isn’t a quick re-skin of Picyard - it’s a ground-up rebuild with dozens of upgrades, new AI features, and a launch offer that bundles $3,000 in premium credits for early Sumo-lings. Below is a transparent look at what’s actually different, why the price is higher, and how we’ll keep delivering value.

Clarifying the “boilerplate” claim

Fresh codebase: Over 100 K lines have been rewritten or refactored since the original open demo; the app now runs a faster, modular React front-end and an all-new Node API with GPU-accelerated image ops.

UI & UX overhaul: The editor, template picker, and export workflow were redesigned after 200+ beta interviews for a <15-second “screenshot-to-share” flow—something the earlier boilerplate never offered.

What’s actually new in Picbolt

1. Ten brand-new tool modules - AI Logo Maker, AI Infographics, ai illustrations, quotes maker, app icons maker , and more.

2. 40+ new features across all tools.

3. $3k shared GPT-image-1 credits for the first 100 buyers—no API setup, no extra cost.

4. Higher-resolution exports (4 K) and lossless PNG/JPEG options tuned for web-perf budgets.

Picyard vs. Picbolt at a glance

Breadth of tools: Picyard focuses on screenshots, code blocks, and device frames. Picbolt covers those plus logos, decks, infographics, and AI illustrations.

Processing speed: Picbolt’s new GPU-backed pipeline cuts average render time by ~42 % in internal tests.

AI credit bundle: Picbolt ships real value on day one; Picyard’s $20 LTD has no comparable credit pool.

Active roadmap: Weekly releases since soft-launch versus quarterly updates on Picyard’s public changelog.

Why a $49 LTD is still fair

1. Immediate ROI: Even modest use of the bundled AI credits offsets the ticket price—those same credits retail for ~$30–$40 alone.

2. Feature cadence: Continuous shipping means the deal’s value grows; early adopters of my previous tool, SmartSpreadsheets, saw 60+ updates without extra cost.

3. Lifetime hosting & GPU costs: Higher infra bills (rendering, storage, CDN) mandate a tier that keeps Picbolt sustainable long-term.

Our commitment going forward

Public roadmap & changelog—every sprint is logged so you can judge progress yourself.

Open door for feedback—feature requests inside the app route straight to our GitHub board.

60-day refund window on AppSumo- try it risk-free; if it doesn’t beat your workflow, you keep the bonuses and get your money back.

Bottom line

Picbolt costs more because it does more -today and in the pipeline. I welcome side-by-side testing; if you find a workflow where Picyard beats Picbolt, let me know and we’ll ship the fix.

Thanks for holding us to a high bar and for protecting the AppSumo community’s trust.

Share
Helpful?
Log in to join the conversation
Verified Purchaser badge

Verified purchaser

Posted: Jun 28, 2025

I agree with Picbolt's founder on this. Picbolt may not be the first, but he has improved on it and added more tool modules that Picyard does not have, such as AI logo maker and infographics. Also, I'm looking forward to Straico integration that's on Picbolt's roadmap.

WonkaWonkaPLUS
Edited: Jun 29, 2025

Woah I wouldnt have known! :0 for $20 for the original sounds like a better deal

Posted: Jun 29, 2025

@Sohails It is being positioned as a screenshot studio - all the features of which are exact replica from picyard. I really don't see any differentiation there. Yes you have added lots of AI tools which are definitely useful and probably all your hard work has gone there. It would have been more prudent promoting this product as an AI toolkit which also has screenshot capabilities.

WonkaWonkaPLUS
Posted: Jun 30, 2025

I also noticed hes re-used the same pictures and graphics from picyard which would be copyright